Evidence with context

Look closely at
the actual work.

What was difficult? What did the evidence suggest? What changed about the support? These cases make the reasoning visible.

Research into practice

Good questions have a research base.

Research informs a starting point. The learner’s response helps determine what to do next.

Institute of Education Sciences · What Works Clearinghouse

Remembering and using what we learn

The practice guide on organizing instruction and study discusses spacing learning, retrieval, and helping learners judge what they know. These principles support asking what remains available after a delay.

Read the practice guide

Education Endowment Foundation

Teaching learners to guide their own work

The guidance on metacognition and self-regulated learning connects explicit teaching, modeling, and scaffolding with planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning. It provides a research context for teaching strategy choice.

Read the guidance report

How to read this evidence

The research links provide context for instructional principles; they do not independently evaluate Synapse + Scaffold or prove the effectiveness of these individual cases. Practice examples are descriptive accounts, not controlled studies or promises of a particular result.

Names, schools, precise dates, diagnoses, and identifying details have been omitted. Private reports and records are not linked publicly. Examples may describe different aspects of the same engagement. Explanatory graphics summarize the teaching ideas; they are not reproductions of student work.

A conversation is a good beginning

You don’t need to have
it all figured out.

Tell me what’s hard, what matters, and what you’d like to change.
We’ll work out a useful next step together.

Let’s talk about it